53 research outputs found
Auctions with Severely Bounded Communication
We study auctions with severe bounds on the communication allowed: each
bidder may only transmit t bits of information to the auctioneer. We consider
both welfare- and profit-maximizing auctions under this communication
restriction. For both measures, we determine the optimal auction and show that
the loss incurred relative to unconstrained auctions is mild. We prove
non-surprising properties of these kinds of auctions, e.g., that in optimal
mechanisms bidders simply report the interval in which their valuation lies in,
as well as some surprising properties, e.g., that asymmetric auctions are
better than symmetric ones and that multi-round auctions reduce the
communication complexity only by a linear factor
Single Parameter Combinatorial Auctions with Partially Public Valuations
We consider the problem of designing truthful auctions, when the bidders'
valuations have a public and a private component. In particular, we consider
combinatorial auctions where the valuation of an agent for a set of
items can be expressed as , where is a private single parameter
of the agent, and the function is publicly known. Our motivation behind
studying this problem is two-fold: (a) Such valuation functions arise naturally
in the case of ad-slots in broadcast media such as Television and Radio. For an
ad shown in a set of ad-slots, is, say, the number of {\em unique}
viewers reached by the ad, and is the valuation per-unique-viewer. (b)
From a theoretical point of view, this factorization of the valuation function
simplifies the bidding language, and renders the combinatorial auction more
amenable to better approximation factors. We present a general technique, based
on maximal-in-range mechanisms, that converts any -approximation
non-truthful algorithm () for this problem into
and -approximate truthful
mechanisms which run in polynomial time and quasi-polynomial time,
respectively
Expressiveness and Robustness of First-Price Position Auctions
Since economic mechanisms are often applied to very different instances of
the same problem, it is desirable to identify mechanisms that work well in a
wide range of circumstances. We pursue this goal for a position auction setting
and specifically seek mechanisms that guarantee good outcomes under both
complete and incomplete information. A variant of the generalized first-price
mechanism with multi-dimensional bids turns out to be the only standard
mechanism able to achieve this goal, even when types are one-dimensional. The
fact that expressiveness beyond the type space is both necessary and sufficient
for this kind of robustness provides an interesting counterpoint to previous
work on position auctions that has highlighted the benefits of simplicity. From
a technical perspective our results are interesting because they establish
equilibrium existence for a multi-dimensional bid space, where standard
techniques break down. The structure of the equilibrium bids moreover provides
an intuitive explanation for why first-price payments may be able to support
equilibria in a wider range of circumstances than second-price payments
Fixed Price Approximability of the Optimal Gain From Trade
Bilateral trade is a fundamental economic scenario comprising a strategically
acting buyer and seller, each holding valuations for the item, drawn from
publicly known distributions. A mechanism is supposed to facilitate trade
between these agents, if such trade is beneficial. It was recently shown that
the only mechanisms that are simultaneously DSIC, SBB, and ex-post IR, are
fixed price mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that are parametrised by a price p,
and trade occurs if and only if the valuation of the buyer is at least p and
the valuation of the seller is at most p. The gain from trade is the increase
in welfare that results from applying a mechanism; here we study the gain from
trade achievable by fixed price mechanisms. We explore this question for both
the bilateral trade setting, and a double auction setting where there are
multiple buyers and sellers. We first identify a fixed price mechanism that
achieves a gain from trade of at least 2/r times the optimum, where r is the
probability that the seller's valuation does not exceed the buyer's valuation.
This extends a previous result by McAfee. Subsequently, we improve this
approximation factor in an asymptotic sense, by showing that a more
sophisticated rule for setting the fixed price results in an expected gain from
trade within a factor O(log(1/r)) of the optimal gain from trade. This is
asymptotically the best approximation factor possible. Lastly, we extend our
study of fixed price mechanisms to the double auction setting defined by a set
of multiple i.i.d. unit demand buyers, and i.i.d. unit supply sellers. We
present a fixed price mechanism that achieves a gain from trade that achieves
for all epsilon > 0 a gain from trade of at least (1-epsilon) times the
expected optimal gain from trade with probability 1 - 2/e^{#T epsilon^2 /2},
where #T is the expected number of trades resulting from the double auction
Efficiency of scalar-parameterized mechanisms
We consider the problem of allocating a fixed amount of an infinitely divisible resource among multiple
competing, fully rational users. We study the efficiency guarantees that are possible when we restrict to
mechanisms that satisfy certain scalability constraints motivated by large scale communication networks;
in particular, we restrict attention to mechanisms where users are restricted to one-dimensional strategy
spaces. We first study the efficiency guarantees possible when the mechanism is not allowed to price differen-
tiate. We study the worst-case efficiency loss (ratio of the utility associated with a Nash equilibrium to the
maximum possible utility), and show that the proportional allocation mechanism of Kelly (1997) minimizes
the efficiency loss when users are price anticipating. We then turn our attention to mechanisms where price
differentiation is permitted; using an adaptation of the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves class of mechanisms, we con-
struct a class of mechanisms with one-dimensional strategy spaces where Nash equilibria are fully efficient.
These mechanisms are shown to be fully efficient even in general convex environments, under reasonable
assumptions. Our results highlight a fundamental insight in mechanism design: when the pricing flexibility
available to the mechanism designer is limited, restricting the strategic flexibility of bidders may actually
improve the efficiency guarantee.National Science FoundationArmy Research OfficeDARPA - Next Generation Internet InitiativeNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowshi
Mechanism Design for Perturbation Stable Combinatorial Auctions
Motivated by recent research on combinatorial markets with endowed valuations
by (Babaioff et al., EC 2018) and (Ezra et al., EC 2020), we introduce a notion
of perturbation stability in Combinatorial Auctions (CAs) and study the extend
to which stability helps in social welfare maximization and mechanism design. A
CA is if the optimal solution is resilient to
inflation, by a factor of , of any bidder's valuation for any
single item. On the positive side, we show how to compute efficiently an
optimal allocation for 2-stable subadditive valuations and that a Walrasian
equilibrium exists for 2-stable submodular valuations. Moreover, we show that a
Parallel 2nd Price Auction (P2A) followed by a demand query for each bidder is
truthful for general subadditive valuations and results in the optimal
allocation for 2-stable submodular valuations. To highlight the challenges
behind optimization and mechanism design for stable CAs, we show that a
Walrasian equilibrium may not exist for -stable XOS valuations for any
, that a polynomial-time approximation scheme does not exist for
-stable submodular valuations, and that any DSIC mechanism that
computes the optimal allocation for stable CAs and does not use demand queries
must use exponentially many value queries. We conclude with analyzing the Price
of Anarchy of P2A and Parallel 1st Price Auctions (P1A) for CAs with stable
submodular and XOS valuations. Our results indicate that the quality of
equilibria of simple non-truthful auctions improves only for -stable
instances with
The evolution of fetal protection policies
This article examines the evolution of fetal protection policies (FPPs) by detailing their historical legacy and a range of contemporary social forces that have contributed to their maintenance. It is based on a case study of the 1977 U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hearings to revise the industrial lead standard, the 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that such policies are unconstitutional ( United Auto Workers v. Johnson Controls , 1991), and the case law preceding that decision. A primary issue is the notion that women and fetuses are disproportionately susceptible to lead. This study reveals the ways in which this belief is framed, disputed, and appropriated by various parties to the fetal protection policy debate. Implications of this case study for family health policy are also discussed.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44656/1/10834_2006_Article_BF02353687.pd
- …